This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Classic Theme
Thottbot Theme
Wintergrasp Changes
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
201933
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
200668
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
2035
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
278900
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
WG is now the bastard son of a BG and world pvp zone.
Post by
166824
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Malestryx
Wintergrasp is laggy at times but at least it is up to me whether I wanted to participate.
Oaclo makes a good point. You are the one choosing whether or not to join WG. It is world PvP. The fact that Blizzard is now making it que base is horrible. Not a good idea. Only thing good about it is the ability to fly over WG.
Post by
Booterang
Not impressed with the change. My guess is that wintergrasp will no longer be as fun as it was before because of this (even though horde often lost on my server due to a 2:1 ratio). Blizzard basically just removed the whole 'idea' behind wintergrasp, which was that of a dynamic world PvP zone.
Post by
Thomasmo
Wintergrasp won't be fun anymore with these changes, what is Blizzard thinking? Queing for a battleground that is on the map, and limiting players. If this is to fix it being uneven and to fix tenacity, it isn't a very good way to go about it.
Post by
248538
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
133226
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
237304
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
248538
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
133226
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
424992
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
83563
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Katsudon
They should just make it completely instanced. Alot of people are going to be wasting time trying to queue and unable to join.
As for tenacity, yea its unfair in 1on1 situations. But the reason they have it is because you have a numerical advantage. Use your advantages......... It would be stupid if you were able to beat someone with tenacity 1on1.
Post by
115964
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Katsudon
Only time tenacity actually helps is defending; Less people defending > much more scared to leave the walls > more turtling > slower rank up for attackers. Of course this only makes it a little slower; once the attackers rank up and get siege, their numerical advantages will make overruning the walls even easier. But if the sides even up numberwise mid battle...... thats the only time i feel that tenacity has actually made a substantial impact.
Post by
Malestryx
I think Tenacity is a real pain in the ass. I can understand why it is in there. But when it comes to attacking vehicles there is no way what so ever they should have Tenacity damage. When I hop in a Siege vehicle and get 2 shotted by a Tenacity guy it is pretty unfair. I don't think I should be punished because the other faction doesn't want to do WG.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.