This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Classic Theme
Thottbot Theme
The Garrosh Thread
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Tritoch
Would Garrosh have ever agreed to launch any kind of joint assault with the Alliance, though? It doesn't seem like it. But, also, who else could have ordered it? Does the Alliance have any quests in Northrend relating to their Wrathgate campaign?
Post by
Adamsm
Bolvar did it on Alliance side. Saurfang the Younger was the leader of the Dragonblight forces wasn't he?
Post by
306612
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Garenzo
I know that they still have their own slums but are you sure its most? Because I can't really see a war effort for the Echo Isles if not for most of the Darkspear to return there, specially since their racial leader is in the isles.
Most might have been an exaggeration but there are a lot of them there, and
I'm not sure if I'd call the place a slum.
It's pretty impressive by troll standards. :-)
Post by
306612
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
229054
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
taurenmoo812
Was Garrosh responsible for the Wrathgate, by the by?
No, that was Sylvanas due to her creating it, and
Thrall in inadvertently for not keeping watch on them undead evil beasties
.
Wrong, Wrong, Wrong.
Garrosh was meant to be responsible for the actions in northrend, because unlike Thrall's position in kalimdor, he wasn't made aware of the production of the plague in undercity. The forsaken made no excuses at hiding it in northrend, and even claimed to gullible horde adventurers it was a weapon against the scourge. If you try and use the excuse that Thralls was responsible, when he had garrosh and saurfang in charge in northrend, where the plague was completed in broad daylight.
So, you say garrosh's hands can be wiped clean and Thrall takes responsibility for this? right.. like always, you take half the facts and twist the rest.
Post by
Adamsm
Hey R-Tard, I didn't say Garrosh hands were wiped clean, don't put words in my mouth, who knows where the hell your hands have been. And fyi,Thrall, as you were so fond of pointing out, is the Warchief, the Leader of the Horde, the final word on everything.... so... yeah.
And Tauren, your the king of twisting %^&*; anything and everything get's turned towards Thrall because of your insane obsession about having his Orc babies; before you 'returned', this thread didn't have a problem with anything, people were at least willing to discuss stuff.... since you've been back, yeah, that went out the window.
Post by
229054
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
I'm really tired of him Delt, I'll take the slap if needed.
Post by
Skreeran
/sigh
Post by
Rankkor
=/ ohh well, I tried.
/trows towel
Post by
306612
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
taurenmoo812
sigh...
you know the funny thing is I'm not a bad guy. What is percieved coming off as trolling is just a defense of what someone steps on an ideal or concept I believe in, and that makes me want to push the matter further.
As anyone knows, in the realm of lore in wow, the story and its characters are actully more important to me then the game mechanics or design or overall playability of the game. To me, wow has one of the most enriching lores of any genre I've read since I was a comic book fan reading x-men comics.
So, I make a point of disliking a character, saying the wrong he does, drawing to those points since thats what I percieve the reason for disliking a character in the lore. As ppl might remember I did the same towards Varian, and honestly, I still feel the same way about him.
The issue now of course isn't Varian, its Garrosh, and his changing of the horde and what it use to be and what it is now. Thats a subject in terms of the lore that matters to me, and I've never been someone to just side on the bench and say 'yeah I'll see what happens', I actully speak out against things that I dislike about it, and like.
However, when disagreements come from other posters on why they think its wrong to assume the worst of certain characters, I'll argue the point of why that is, and why its important.
The subject thats the main focus a lot recently is garrosh, and how people both like what he does, and those that dislike it. I'm on one side just with a stronger view on saying why its bad, the same as anyone who would be saying the same about back why they dislike Thrall or why garrosh is so great.
It gets percieved as trolling because I would sooner stick to what I believe in then conform to what someone else thinks. Hell, if I did that any other way, I'd probably believe being gay was a crime and be seeing someone to 'reform' me.
As much as someone could say I'm a troller, I simply reserve the right to say why I think something is wrong, even when someone else disagrees with it.
Post by
HoleofArt
I smell some bromance all up in this thread.
Word.
Post by
Adamsm
Not taking back what I said, but I'll stop.
Post by
382219
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Monday
you know the funny thing is I'm not a bad guy. What is percieved coming off as trolling is just a defense of what someone steps on an ideal or concept I believe in, and that makes me want to push the matter further.
K, we wouldn't see you as a bad person, if you weren't so freaking confrontational, narrow minded and possessing a severe case of metaphorical tunnel vision.
You say the same things over and over, even when confronted with real, established lore. And also almost every one of your posts revolves around Garrosh = bad Thrall = good.
Thus, we ignore you and call you a troll.
As much as someone could say I'm a troller, I simply reserve the right to say why I think something is wrong, even when someone else disagrees with it.
Aye, but you try to take away that right from others, like if somebody says they like Garrosh you just dismiss them outright and diss them and ignore them. Thus you are trolling.
Also, I dare you to, in all seriousness, counter my argument.
Someday we'll all learn that these aren't the Wowhead forums. These are the Adamsm forums.
Nonono dont stop. It's like a soap opera I can watch between pulls. :)
Not really, Adams just likes to butt heads with Tauren.
Post by
Tritoch
Could you present your argument again, for those who aren't as time-endowed to scroll back over thirty pages? A little rehash would be very nice.
Post by
382219
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.