This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Classic Theme
Thottbot Theme
[idea] ret healer (from a newbie paladin)
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
allsensesfailed
playing a ret pally for long time and the only toon i actually play..... have tried this with not much success..... it is awsome however to save a raid or a group when the healer goes down for a short period of time, but using a healing ret.... good luck with trying to get over 2500 dps... just go duel spec and carry both sets of gear with you and have fun dpsing or straight healing.
Post by
228908
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
slasher0161
Tried sheathadin and there is no viability to it, lack of haste and lack of bacon for a pitiful hot unless your HL spamming which you can't do now without gear from raids that require a proper HOLY healer. Conclusion the viability of this spec requires you to have already cleared things and be doing it for %^&*s and giggles.
Post by
147614
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
slasher0161
This was done about 2 months ago
in a PuG, and I don't have any evidence. If you don't believe me, I really don't care.
So it was so effective that your main source of evidence is an undocumented pug 2 months ago.
It's not a question of not wanting to believe you, it's a question of you providing zero evidence to support your claims.
If you don't believe men, I really don't care.
Congratz you can quote yourself, do you want a freaking clap. I'm sure people will still read it and see that your arguement is invalid (see bolded text) different patch = different mechanics = invalid data even if it was legit.
Post by
Lbowrm
So does this mean that Kenyon9996 is unreliable in his other posts as well? >_<
Crap...accurate info is so hard to gather unless you spend hours sifting through everything and come up with a general consensus. And I don't have the time.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
So does this mean that Kenyon9996 is unreliable in his other posts as well? >_<
Crap...accurate info is so hard to gather unless you spend hours sifting through everything and come up with a general consensus. And I don't have the time.
I don't think anyone here has anything against kenyon9996. He's just making an unsubstantiated claim from his own experience. So no, we can't call that accurate info. WoW is a math game; nothing is accurate until you have cold, hard numbers.
Edit: Spelling :P
Post by
Squishalot
Sorry, I'm going to need to agree with Hyperspacerebel.
kenyon's said some pretty informed things in the past, so it's not that we've got anything against him. But to make a claim that a spec is good (or bad) without being flamed, he needs to provide some sort of evidence, either through some in-game stats, or through theorycraft explaining why his spec might work.
Edit: See signature. ArgentSun thinks it's, pardon his language, full of crap... xD
Congratz you can quote yourself, do you want a freaking clap.
Actually, he mis-quoted himself. *cough* Generally, I don't believe
men
(or women, for that matter), which is why I don't believe kenyon unless he did have something tangible to work with.
Post by
147614
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Squishalot
If you don't believe men, I really don't care.
I did it on purpose that time.
Yes, but it makes just as little sense then as it does now. Unless you'd care greatly if we didn't believe women? (But who really believes women?)
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.