This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Classic Theme
Thottbot Theme
*From Blizzard* Class Q&A Warrior Part 1 *Update Part 2* *A Must Read*
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
378468
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
378468
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
244714
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
355887
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
422275
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Olthoi
I think it's a poor design for Fury to be the DPS spec for well-geared warriors. If you don't have the gear required for Fury rage generation, the tree has zero use. I suppose this will be resolved in their overhaul of rage mechanics, but it looks like that could still be a long ways away...
Post by
249233
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
140351
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
422275
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Rubendesmet619
<<Warrior damage should look like that of Feral druids, Enhancement shamans, Retribution paladins, and death knights. If their damage isn’t at that level, then it’s possible our numbers need some tweaking.>>
LMFAO! When I can crank out 100% crit 8-10K lavabursts or do 10-20K burst damage within 6 seconds (pallys) or rape/stun in kitty cat form, I'll believe that statement.
I realy REALY don't know what you mean by this post...
Your saying warriors are OP?
Post by
masti
<<Warrior damage should look like that of Feral druids, Enhancement shamans, Retribution paladins, and death knights. If their damage isn’t at that level, then it’s possible our numbers need some tweaking.>>
LMFAO! When I can crank out 100% crit 8-10K lavabursts or do 10-20K burst damage within 6 seconds (pallys) or rape/stun in kitty cat form, I'll believe that statement.
I realy REALY don't know what you mean by this post...
Your saying warriors are OP?
think hes saying the opposite and that blizzard needs to "tweak" their numbers a bit.
Post by
140351
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Buttery
A lot of bloated dps numbers are commonly referenced when comparing to other hybrid dps classes. This almost always due to trash. On bosses, warriors are pretty even with other hybrids in similar gear. Shammies (esp enh) benefit more from buffs than most others, but at the same time, thier dmg is VERY bursty, thus a single dps number may be skewed. Pali and DK have true AoE, so stop the QQ about low overall dps, it all about boss performance and overall dmg done where we are only slighty behind.
Big AoE is where we are lacking in comparison and we either need a true aoe attack (no target limit, good dmg) or single target dmg buff. They say cleave w/ two target has dmg = to 6 target dmg of a true AoE, but what happens when there are more than that or the mobs are low-medium hp trash like zombie chow or scrapbots?
Essesntially, new glyph thunderclap to drop debuff, reduce threat, imp. dmg.
Post by
261871
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
355887
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
318373
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
137386
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
318373
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
378468
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
78077
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.