This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Classic Theme
Thottbot Theme
Arms spec 2.3
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
ludvig
http://www.wowhead.com/?talent=LGMhdAioz0zZVV0V0gRV
please add some comments
Post by
89980
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
ludvig
ye but flurry helps ALOT and with 2h axe and nice crit chance its procs alot more often and give u 25%more dmg almost all the time dont you agree?
Post by
89980
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
ludvig
will do, my partner is slower then a toad but almost full epic he just need some skills xD
Post by
70371
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
89980
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
snooks
http://www.wowhead.com/?talent=LV0xbAioM0dioVxzm0x
is will be the specc im gonna use in 2.3 since .rage bonus and dw with imp intercept and thats what i had before but with points in fury and now i specc same talents in arms and dont need more points fury so thats a 25% bonus rage, and for disarm effects..... sucks big time but throw a wep chain and sweeping strikes i hardly ever use in since the targets have to stand so close to each other and on high rating arena games many people know not to stand near to a ms warrior. so i hardly think its efffective so im my opinion using 25% more rage all the time is better then attacking 2 targets with luck,
Taunt a pet bring it close to another target and pop SS -> WW. You hit each target twice so worth it.
I wouldn't play with your spec. I like to 2on2 and 3on3 and I need to be able to def stance -> reflect to avoid 3 DPS warrior gib teams. Also tonight I have been disarming every warrior i see everytime the CD is up. I'm amazed how many people didnt get Weapon mastery. 25% more rage all the time sure, but you only have your weapon 50 seconds a minute. Weapon chain means you wont be able to get savagery or the new armour negating enchant.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.