This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Classic Theme
Thottbot Theme
Are Shammies gimped at 70?
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
99217
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
97399
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Jidor
Don't you think it's safe to assume that if a class is underpowered at level 70, 2 things would occur:
1) People would not
be
playing level 70 shaman
2) Blizzard would at least attempt to fix the situation?
And since there are a plethora of level 70 shaman(Let's compare their population to Druids) can't we say that they are not "gimp as hell"?
Anecdote time.
I play a 41/20 Hunter, and I'm no huntard. I only get beat by Combat rogues on the meters, or if I'm distracted by The Office on TV. Anyhow, I've made one good friend on my server, who played 40/0/21 Shaman. While I still beat him in the damage, he was always #2 in damage, and he was never more than 5% away from me. ...He plays resto now :<
Post by
66520
And since there are a plethora of level 70 shaman(Let's compare their population to Druids) can't we say that they are not "gimp as hell"?
Every single Armory census has consistently shown Shamans to be the lowest populated class in the game.
Post by
63926
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.