This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Classic Theme
Thottbot Theme
Who would win 1v1 holy pally or resto druid?
Return to board index
Post by
610875
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
goshadstep2lose
Then again, you might be following it well, and the 06:41am with no sleep is making me confused.
its not you, lavatsunami's logic is historically hard to follow
Post by
243770
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
610875
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
goshadstep2lose
your opinion (post has no value), was backed by
fact
(poster is a troll), and good thing i never denied that the posts value was opinion
in which you stated another opinion (troll posts should be disregarded), in which you didnt even follow (you responded to the posters question).
also, you are missing something... think hard before you respond
I know youre not stupid enough to lose the trail of logic in this argument, but nice try :D I must have missed the part where i said I lost the trail of logic in this argument
Post by
243770
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
243770
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
goshadstep2lose
"the question has no answer as the two (assuming equal skill/gear) will never be able to defeat each other"
and even then, lets say somehow you did actually disregard the ops question, 14 other people didn't. so they either
its a shame that it comes to this after all the hint, hint & nudge, nudge
disregard =/= ignore
1) didnt think he was a troll 14/1 (im not counting broken on this, im not sure if he thought he was a troll or not)
and how does this support the claim that the OP isnt trolling
thought he was a troll and didnt think his question should be disregarded 14/1 (were assuming that you answering this question is still somehow disregarding) OR
they were unaware that he was trolling
OR
because of other posters naiveté they felt the need to reiterate what had already been said
neither
either way you're odds are bad. selective arguments are still very selective
"its not you, lavatsunami's logic is historically hard to follow"
i took this as you were having difficulty following the logic.
no
, but you might have trouble following
Post by
243770
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
goshadstep2lose
"disregard =/= ignore"
LMFAO
"to pay no attention to; leave out of consideration; IGNORE" (from your link, mind you).
2) to treat without due regard, respect, or attentiveness; slight
you're just full of win
so no hint hint nudgy nudgy required, i used your own link, lmao. (btw, if you keep making it this easy, i might have to build a trophy cabinet of my own) allow me a moment to bask
thats nice
lets continue
the fact that 16 people (no way to not include you, lol), chose to not disregard the question, by answering it, means that either:
1) he IS a troll and was not disregarded therefore people do not believe troll posts should be disregarded = you lose
2) people did not think he was a troll, so they responded = you lose
3) not a single person knew ("was unaware") he was trolling, thought it was a legitimate question, and is therefore stupid.
its ok, with your ego.. i already know which one youd pick....
because of other posters naiveté they felt the need to reiterate what had already been said
neither
people did not think he was a troll, so they responded = you lose try not to dodge the obvious point this time, how, from a posters naivete can you conclude that a person isn't guilty of something
non sequitir logic is poor support
he IS a troll and was not disregarded therefore people do not believe troll posts should be disregarded = you lose again
non sequitir
not a single person knew ("was unaware") he was trolling, thought it was a legitimate question, and is therefore stupid. its pretty safe to assume the people who answered with some form of neither knew what was going on
Post by
368348
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
243770
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
243770
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Lightrain
Equally geared. It's hard to say really, the druid will never go oom, but the pally will be able to dispell moonfire and/or insect swarm. But he will also never go oom because he can bubble, lay on hands and seal+ judgement of wisdom, who would win?
The one who resurects his partner first.
O.o
/thread
Post by
119023
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Liquoid
To summarise, there are two types of people in this world: People goshad doesn't agree with and people he does not agree with.
I'd advise both types to stay well away from this thread!
And go visit Rogue forums instead!
Post by
153514
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
goshadstep2lose
hold on let me take the piece of the definition that suits my argument. we can go back and forth all day.... if it suits my argument, its pretty safe to assume that is how i was using it
sporting a hard on for an obviously irrelevant definition, so easily shrugged off as such, is kinda sad however
OMG, but it DOES mean ignore!only when used in that sense
likewise:
used in that
sense
1.
many of the faculties, as sight, hearing, smell, taste, or touch, by which humans and animals perceive stimuli originating from outside or inside the body.
15.
the meaning of a word or phrase in a specific context, esp. as isolated in a dictionary or glossary; the semantic element in a word or group of words.
aha! so clearly i was just talking about your sense of sight, smell, taste, touch, and hearing since that was the first definition
...english
...learn it
lemme see, then you threw around some "non sequitur" bs.... hmmm.... since i'm sure when you just googled that its definition was over your head Ill point out with examples what it is and exactly how it pertains to this discussion
...because I'm that kinda guy
basically, when you come to a "logical" conclusion, that isn't supported by your premise, it is non sequitur...
he is a troll, and since people responded that means people think that troll posts should be regarded
since people responded, they must not think he is a trollthey didn't know he was a troll, and therefore are stupid
"posters naivete",
in your mind equals this:
"stupid" you are a mind reader as well?
I have clearly underestimated you!
also; if I meant "stupid", i would have probably said "poster stupidity," not "poster naivety"...
how you constantly speak on the behalf of everyone else"posters naivete" in your mind equals this: "stupid"hypocrite much?
you run into trouble on these forums because you are an egotistical maniac who sees the world only through your narrow viewpoint. what trouble have i run into on these forums?
no matter what you say, to you, it is always right, and everyone else is always either stupid or wrong. because I am able to support what I say without dodging and tangents, not because I say I am
(you lose)
the problem is *gasp* you are not perfect, and your imperfections and hypocrisies are apparent almost every time you post. your personal biases had nothing to do with this statement i'm sure
also: wtb some instances of my apparent self proclaimed perfection
...just for the lulz
as ive said before... get over yourself mate, you're really not the (insert awesomeness) that you think you are.dodge noted
points stand
i really, really hope you are not like this in real life. if so, i pity the people around you.lolumad
Post by
goshadstep2lose
I really hope the OP was trolling, 'cause that would make this epic troll win.
this
Post by
160546
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
This topic is locked. You cannot post a reply.