This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Classic Theme
Thottbot Theme
Should I Go Survival or Stay Marksmenship
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
346973
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
221451
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
355869
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
TehTerokkar
I personally always prefer Marks for the easy "rotation", Surv has DoTs and I hate putting them back up.
Since in Marks ur Chimera Shot resets the duration of SS(and also some dmg through SS) and crits for +10K's, it's my favourite, seeing big crits, just gotta love it ;3
Post by
barbeque
You have enough passive ArP that either spec should be very close. You'll lose DPS when you're kiting on any fight, so ignore your results on Saurfang for the purposes of determining what's the best build.
Actually OP's passive ArP comes from gemming ArP. ArP gemming is not recommended until you can get about 700 passive ArP from gear alone. With this current gem-set, your performance as SV will not be optimal either.
With your current set up, I believe you'll see a DPS increase if you stay MM and switch all your gems to Agi instead of ArP.
But yes, kiting adds will reduce your DPS, so it is not a very good measure of damage output.
Post by
346973
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
realmlist
why does everyone say 'markmenship' when the real word is marksmanship?
anyway, i personally prefer MM for PvE.
with a good amount of ArP i managed to get 8k DPS.(also other goo stuff, but ArP was the main thing).
http://www.wowhead.com/?forums&topic=140965&p=1789256#post-reply
what hunter and what ArP? u said u never played huntsman before.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.